Coping with Surveillance Capitalism in the Sharing Economy

Abstract for the Reshaping Work Conference

Coping with Surveillance Capitalism in the Sharing Economy

Michael Etter

Center for CSR
Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark Me.msc@cbs.dk

Christoph Lutz

Nordic Centre for Internet & Society
BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway christoph.lutz@bi.no

Gemma Newlands

Nordic Centre for Internet & Society
BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway gemma.e.newlands@bi.no

Giulia Ranzini

Faculty of Social Sciences > Communication Science Communication Choices, Content and Consequences (CCCC) Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands g.ranzini@vu.nl

499 words without references

 

Background

In recent years, many observers have predicted that the future of work will be reshaped by the gradual spread of micro-entrepreneurship opportunities. Driving this trend, a range of commercial online sharing platforms such as Airbnb, Uber, BlaBlaCar, and Bondora have emerged, enabling the decentralized matching of providers of goods and services with potential consumers. These new forms of micro-entrepreneurship have been grouped under the term ‘sharing economy’ (Benkler, 2004; Botsman & Rogers, 2010; Sundararajan, 2016).

The literature has pointed to the benefits of the sharing economy (Benkler, 2004; Botsman & Rogers, 2010; Sundararajan, 2016), ranging from social aspects such as community building (Belk, 2007; Hamari et al., 2016; Möhlmann, 2015), economic benefits (Bardhi & Eckhardt, 2010; Bucher et al., 2016), and increased sustainability (Frenken, 2017).

However, recent scholarship has started to shed light on the darker sides of the sharing economy which might profoundly affect the future of work in as yet unforeseen ways. Questions have been raised regarding power (Newlands et al., 2017), algorithms (Calo & Rosenblat, 2017), information asymmetries (van Doorn, 2017), ratings (Fradkin et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2015), and the disruption of established industries (Bond, 2015; Zervas et al., 2016)

We use the lens of surveillance capitalism (Zuboff, 2015), which critically understands the use of data collection processes as a form of capital accumulation, to reveal a gradual normalization of the problematic data-centered aspects of the sharing economy. Focusing on control and privacy (Lutz et al., 2017), we discuss the role of sharing platforms in conditioning users – particularly providers as micro-entrepreneurs – to become comfortable with increased surveillance and quantification.

Method

We conducted a total of 20 focus groups across 6 European countries (United Kingdom, Italy, Norway, Switzerland, Germany, and the Netherlands). The participants were aged between 20 and 35 years and included both providers and consumers of sharing economy services. Participants were guided to discuss their privacy concerns and strategies of managing privacy boundaries while engaging in sharing economy services. A second focus of the discussions concerned power-related aspects such as algorithms, ratings, platform communication, and bargaining power.

Preliminary Results

In a first analysis of our data, several themes emerged that explain the relationship between users’ privacy concerns and surveillance. We identified an increasing awareness among micro-entrepreneurs and scepticism towards the surveillance and data collection practices of sharing platforms. We also identified a resignation among providers towards these practices. While some providers framed the data collection and privacy intrusion as an unavoidable part of doing business, others developed coping mechanisms related to cynicism, avoidance, and forms of resistance. Furthermore, our data shows how quantification through ratings and reviews facilitated practices of self-surveillance, as well as strategic oversharing as a way to

gain intangible assets, such as trust, or a privileged access to the platform. More generally we observe how providers experience micro-entrepreneurship increasingly as a sharing of self.

Contribution

With this explorative study we contribute to a better understanding for how micro- entrepreneurs deal with contemporary and possibly future challenges of the sharing economy.

References

Benkler, Y. (2004). Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. Yale Law Journal, 114(2), 273-358.

Bond, A. (2015). An app for that: Local governments and the rise of the sharing economy. Notre Dame Law Review, 90(2), 77-96.

Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What's mine is yours: how collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. London, UK: Collins.

Calo, R., & Rosenblat, A. (2017). The Taking Economy: Uber, Information, and Power. SSRN Electronic Journal. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2929643

Fradkin, A., Grewal, A., Holtz, D., & Pearson, M. (2015). Bias and reciprocity in online reviews: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb. In EC '15 Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (pp. 641-641). New York, NY: ACM.

Frenken, K. (2017). Sustainability perspectives on the sharing economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23, 1-2

Lee, M. K., Kusbit, D., Metsky, E., & Dabbish, L. (2015). Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. In CHI’15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1603-1612). New York, NY: ACM.

Lutz, C., Hoffmann, C. P., Bucher, E., & Fieseler, C. (2017). The role of privacy concerns in the sharing economy. Information, Communication & Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1339726

Newlands, G., Lutz, C., & Fieseler, C. (2017). Power in the sharing economy. Report for the EU Horizon 2020 project Ps2Share: Participation, Privacy, and Power in the Sharing Economy. Retrieved from www.ps2share.eu/documentation

Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowdbased capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Suzor, N. (2016). Digital constitutionalism: Using the rule of law to evaluate the legitimacy of governance by platforms. GigaNet: Global Internet Governance Academic Network, Annual Symposium 2016.

 

Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and

 

Technology, 32(3), 61.

 

Van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low- income service work in the ‘on-demand’economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898-914.

Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. (2016). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of Marketing. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1509/jmr.15.0204

Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75-89.